Comparative Study of Feto-Maternal Outcome of Antenatal Cases as per the Standard WHO Guidelines vs Revised Antenatal Visit Schedule during COVID 19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Bikram Bhardwaj Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AFMC, Pune
  • Aruna Menon Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AFMC, Pune
  • Vipin Kumar Prajapati Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AFMC, Pune
  • Apphia Saphir Kathi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AFMC, Pune
  • Randeep Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AFMC, Pune

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2023.08.01.12

Abstract

Background: Good antenatal care helps a woman face labour in good health and optimum conditions. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and WHO guidelines suggest 15 visits in the whole pregnancy. Keeping in view the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the exposure of pregnant ladies the number of antenatal visits was reduced to 7 milestone visits and outcome was noted. This study aimed to do a comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in antenatal cases at our centre using standard WHO protocol vs. revised antenatal protocol during COVID-19 pandemic.

Subjects and Method: This was an observational study done at a tertiary care center of an Armed forces hospital with target population as pregnant ladies attending antenatal care Out patient department of the hospital during COVID19 pandemic Vs Antenatal cases in previous 1 year. A comparative analysis of pregnancy outcome, maternal variables during pregnancy and delivery along with neonatal variables was done.

Results: There were lesser deliveries by 41.7% as compared to non-COVID times. There was an increase in the caesarean delivery rate and instrumental delivery rate during COVID times by 11% and 53% respectively.  There was increase in Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) by 26.6%. The incidence of fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, maternal anaemia and gestational diabetes mellitus, oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios was low. The incidence of spontaneous abortions was also low in our study. In contrast, the incidence of pre-term deliveries doubled from 7.4% to 13.4%. Neonatal morbidity and mortality indicators like Neonatal Intensive care unit (NICU) admissions showed a rising trend of 1.7% during the COVID (14.6% to 16.3%) with a minimal rise in early neonatal deaths by 0.2%.

Conclusion: Our model doesn't show an increase in maternal, neonatal morbidity, and mortality. This model can be used as a standard of care for Antenatal patients during Pandemics. It reduces the risk exposure of the gravid mother without any significant increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: antenatal care, COVID-19 pandemic, revised antenatal schedule.

Correspondence: Vipin Kumar Prajapati. Graded Specialist Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, AFMC, Pune. Email: vipinafmc@gmail.com. Contact No: 8811015130

References

Bloom SS, Lippeveld T, Wypij D (1999). Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan. 14(1):38-48. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.38.

Bunnell ME, Koenigs KJ, Roberts DJ, Quade BJ, Hornick JL, Goldfarb IT (2021). Third trimester stillbirth during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Similar rates with increase in placental vasculopathic pathology. Placenta. 109:72-74. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.04.003.

Carroli G, Villar J, Piaggio G, Khan-Neelofur D, Gülmezoglu M, Mugford M, Lumbiganon P, et al. (2001). WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet.357(9268):156570. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(00)047231.

Carter EB, Tuuli MG, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG (2016). Number of prenatal visits and pregnancy outcomes in low-risk women. J Perinatol. 36(3):178-81. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.183.

Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio G (2015). Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(7):CD000934. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub3.

Elsaddig M, Khalil A (2021). Effects of the COVID pandemic on pregnancy outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 73:125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.03.004.

Guidelines for perinatal care (2017). 8th ed. American Academy of Paediatrics,169.

Hamilton B, Martin J, Osterman M (2021). Births: Provisional Data for 2020. doi: 10.15620/cdc:104993.

Jering KS, Claggett BL, Cunningham JW, Rosenthal N, Vardeny O, Greene MF, Solomon SD (2021). Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized women giving birth with and without COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 181(5): 714-717. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9241.

Kaunitz AM, Spence C, Danielson TS, Rochat RW, Grimes DA (1984). Perinatal and maternal mortality in a religious group avoiding obstetric care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 150(7):826-31. doi: 10.1016/00029378(84)904575.

Khalil A, von Dadelszen P, Draycott T, Ugwumadu A, O'Brien P, Magee L (2020). Change in the incidence of stillbirth and preterm delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 324 (7):705–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12746.

Klerman LV, Ramey SL, Goldenberg RL, Marbury S, Hou J, Cliver SP (2001). A randomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk, Medicaideligible African American women. Am J Public Health. 91(1):105-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.105.

National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK) (2008). Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. RCOG Press

Rotshenker-Olshinka K, Volodarsky-Perel A, Steiner N, Rubenfeld E, Dahan MH (2021). COVID-19 pandemic effect on early pregnancy: are miscarriage rates altered, in asymptomatic women? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 303(3):839-845. doi: 10.1007/s00404020058480.

Qi H, Luo X, Zheng Y, Zhang H, Li J, Zou L, Feng L, et al. (2021). Safe delivery for pregnancies affected by COVID-19. BJOG. 127(8):927-929. doi: 10.1111/14710528.16231

Shah PS, Ye XY, Yang J, Campitelli MA. (2021). Preterm birth and stillbirth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ. 193(30):E1164-E1172. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210081.

Villar J, Farnot U, Barros F, Victora C, Langer A, Belizan JM (1993). A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies. The Latin American Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Research. N Engl J Med. 327(18):1266-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210293271803.

Villar J, Ariff S, Gunier RB, Thiruvengadam R, Rauch S, Kholin A, Roggero P, et al. (2022). Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: the INTERCOVID multinational cohort study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):817-826. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1050. Erratum in: JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jan 1; 176(1):104.

Vogel JP, Habib NA, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Dowswell T, Carroli G, Baaqrrl Hs, et al. (2013). Antenatal care pack-ages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial. Reprod Health 10, 19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/174247551019.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-16

How to Cite

Bhardwaj, B., Menon, A., Prajapati, V. K., Kathi, A. S., & Singh, R. (2023). Comparative Study of Feto-Maternal Outcome of Antenatal Cases as per the Standard WHO Guidelines vs Revised Antenatal Visit Schedule during COVID 19 Pandemic. Journal of Maternal and Child Health, 8(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2023.08.01.12

Issue

Section

Articles